RSM logo
Clinical Risk

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Clin Risk 2008;14:211-214
doi:10.1258/cr.2008.080089
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Patient safety

Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: some legal implications

Tracey Elliott

Email: t.a.elliott{at}qmul.ac.uk

This article explores some of the main legal implications of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) scanning and treatment, particularly in relation to the interpretation of AAA scans, the provision of patients with adequate information about their options and the risks involved, and issues in relation to monitoring, re-scanning and re-calling the patient for further assessment and treatment. It is suggested that the introduction of national AAA scanning programme is likely to lead to an increase in litigation claims in this field, and that, given the complex nature of the risk–benefit assessment in relation to AAA treatment, particular care needs to be taken to ensure that patients are properly informed about their condition and its treatment, if Chester v Afshar-type claims are to be avoided.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




MDU Exam Doctor