RSM logo
Clinical Risk

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Clin Risk 2008;14:96-100
doi:10.1258/cr.2008.080020
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Draycott, T.
Right arrow Articles by Lloyd, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Clinical Negligence

A template for reviewing the strength of evidence for obstetric brachial plexus injury in clinical negligence claims

Tim Draycott, Dr Carolyn Sanders, Dr Joanna Crofts and Joanna Lloyd

Email: tdraycott{at}gmail.com

Obstetric brachial plexus injury (OBPI) is uncommon but accounts for a significant proportion of obstetric clinical negligence claims. There is debate in the medical literature and in legal proceedings regarding the causation of OBPI, particularly whether OBPI is caused by the accoucheur applying excessive traction or simply through the forces of labour itself.

This paper reviews the medical literature and legal case law surrounding OBPI and presents a template for reviewing the strength of evidence for OBPI in clinical negligence claims. The template contains factors more likely to be present if the OBPI was caused by the maternal forces of labour ‘propulsion injury’ (injury to the posterior arm, no documented evidence of shoulder dystocia, up-to-date training, appropriate shoulder dystocia management, no evidence of excessive traction, correct number of birth attendants, precipitous second stage, temporary injury) and factors more likely if the injury is iatrogenic (injury to the anterior arm, shoulder dystocia, no recent training, incorrect shoulder dystocia resolution manoeuvres used, evidence of excessive traction, insufficient birth attendants, fundal pressure, permanent injury). Each factor does not, in itself, establish causation, but the template may provide a useful aid to legal teams reviewing medical notes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Units Symbols and Abbreviations Sixth edition