RSM logo
Clinical Risk

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
Clin Risk 2008;14:93-95
doi:10.1258/cr.2008.080017
© 2008 Royal Society of Medicine Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Experts' Discussions

Experts' discussions

Lucy Clements Smith

Email: lucy.clementssmith{at}blm-law.com

Reports reaching the Clinical Disputes Forum (see http://www.clinicaldisputesforum.org.uk) have suggested that the practice of experts' discussions (‘experts’ meetings') in the context of Clinical Disputes has recently encountered problems. A meeting was convened on 21 November 2007 at the Law Society, at which some of these problems were discussed. This article summarizes that debate, focusing on the ordering of discussions, agenda, timetables and the presence of lawyers – and some possible solutions are considered.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




MDU Exam Doctor

 Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research Frameworks for Radiology Reporting